[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: omniorb-list
Subject: Re: [omniORB] omniORB Authentication Methods
From: "Simon McQueen" <sm () prismtech ! com>
Date: 2006-10-25 9:30:58
Message-ID: 453F2ED2.9010008 () prismtech ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Duncan,
Thanks very much for the reply.
On 24/10/2006 13:22, Duncan Grisby wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 October, "Simon McQueen" wrote:
>
>> On 24/10/2006 10:17, Duncan Grisby wrote:
>>> Sorry, I got mixed up. In 4.0.x you _can_ send system exceptions from
>>> interceptors. What you can't do is send user exceptions from them. You
>>> can throw both kinds of exceptions in 4.1.x.
>> Introducing behaviour that contravenes the current CORBA spec ? What
>> motivated that change.
>
> omniORB's interceptors use a proprietary interface anyway, so the CORBA
> spec is irrelevant here.
Ah, ok. I didn't know that. Does omniORB's implementation pre-date the
portable interceptor spec or was it a conscious decision to go with an
alternate design ?
> I've encountered several situations where it
> can be useful to raise user exceptions from an interceptor, to indicate
> problems in service contexts.
Cheers,
--
Simon McQueen sm@prismtech.com
OpenFusion CORBA & OpenSplice DDS http://prismtech.com/middleware
_______________________________________________
omniORB-list mailing list
omniORB-list@omniorb-support.com
http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omniorb-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic