[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       olpc-open
Subject:    Re: [Olpc-open] Working on a repository system for Nepal's
From:       "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb () cesmail ! net>
Date:       2007-12-14 2:28:29
Message-ID: 4761EA4D.5010907 () cesmail ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Bryan Berry wrote:
> Ed that's a great idea, to set up the use cases and to use RoR or
> Django . You could use those frameworks for the UI but you really need a
> mature and __scalable__ back-end for the library, particularly when a
> real e-library will have an immense amount of distibuted storage,
> metadata, and enhanced search capabilities. I don't there is any single
> ruby 'rail' or django 'snippet' that can provide all of those :)

I don't know anything about Django, any end, back or front. But I can 
certainly vouch for the scalability of the most common Rails back ends 
such as PostgreSQL, as well as the scalability of the most common web 
server for Rails, Mongrel. This stuff works and scales.

As far as the "middle end" is concerned -- the "business logic" in the 
model part of the Rails Model-View-Controller architecture -- that's 
where I think you'd have the most performance risk. However, I'm sure 
that if there's a "budget" for this, posting on the Rails mailing list 
would turn up some people who would love to take this on. That list can 
be found at http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails.


> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Olpc-open mailing list
Olpc-open@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-open
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]