[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ntbugtraq
Subject:    Microsoft updates documentation on Windows time synchronization
From:       3APA3A <3APA3A () SECURITY ! NNOV ! RU>
Date:       2004-08-24 9:45:13
Message-ID: 1486825617.20040824134513 () SECURITY ! NNOV ! RU
[Download RAW message or body]

Dear lists,

  Sorry  for additional noise.

  Microsoft  published  Q884776  "Configuring  the  Windows Time service
  against a large time offset"

  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;884776

  In  addition to clear description on new registry keys in Windows 2000
  SP4  and  Windows  2003 Microsoft added recommendation to use hardware
  time  source.  Design flaw is currently fixed by documentation. I hope
  finally   MS   will   implement   signing   at   least  for  it's  own
  time.windows.com.

  P.S.  just  to make things clear: Microsoft is one of very few vendors
  who  really  cares  about time synchronisation infrastructure security
  during  operation  system  design.  Even flawed this infrastructure is
  much better than any unimplemented or undocumented infrastructure.

-- 
http://www.security.nnov.ru
         /\_/\
        { , . }     |\
+--oQQo->{ ^ }<-----+ \
> ZARAZA  U  3APA3A   } You know my name - look up my number (The Beatles)
+-------------o66o--+ /
                    |/

-----
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that \
just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the \
individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of \
Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, \
you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: \
                field.
-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]