[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: nssldap
Subject: Re: [nssldap] Problem with pam_ldap or with
From: "Matthew B. Brookover" <mbrookov () mines ! edu>
Date: 2005-10-05 17:15:17
Message-ID: 1128532517.9395.10.camel () merlin ! Mines ! EDU
[Download RAW message or body]
I have to agree with Gordon, I could not run ldap without nscd. The
load on the ldap servers would drag things to a halt.
Matt
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 09:41, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
> > ty den 04.10.2005 Klokka 17:59 (+0200) skreiv Michele Marcionelli:
> >
> >> /etc/nscd.conf ?
> >
> >
> > nscd is utter death. Kill it, never use it again..
>
>
> Out of curiosity, why do you believe that? I insist that all of my ldap
> users use nscd to reduce load on the servers.
>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.10">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I have to agree with Gordon, I could not run ldap without nscd. The load on the \
ldap servers would drag things to a halt.<BR> <BR>
Matt<BR>
<BR>
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 09:41, Gordon Messmer wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> ty den 04.10.2005 Klokka 17:59 (+0200) skreiv Michele Marcionelli:
>
>> /etc/nscd.conf ?
>
>
> nscd is utter death. Kill it, never use it again..
Out of curiosity, why do you believe that? I insist that all of my ldap
users use nscd to reduce load on the servers.
</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic