[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ngw
Subject:    Re: [ngw] Reply only to post office
From:       "Lilith Calbridge" <lilith () dcccd ! edu>
Date:       2007-04-27 19:29:54
Message-ID: 463208E2.C7C3.00AE.1
[Download RAW message or body]

Just another field for Novell to add to the rules options.  :-)

Lil

>>> On 4/27/2007 at 1:59 PM, "Mary Matthews" <mlm23@calvin.edu> wrote:
> We have a similiar setup, but as you mentioned there' no mention of
the PO it
> comes from in the message.  But now I'm curious, so I expect I'll be

> monkeying
> around a bit with it to see if I can figure this one out. 
> 
> It's no like I don't have 20 projects on my plate at the moment.  :)
> 
> Mary
> 
>>>> "Lilith Calbridge" <lilith@dcccd.edu> 4/26/2007 5:44 PM >>>
> Same domain but currently not the same post office.
> 
> Lil
> 
>>>> On 4/26/2007 at 4:00 PM, "Mary Matthews" <mlm23@calvin.edu>
wrote:
>> Hi Lil!
>> 
>> Is this for another PO in the same domain, separate domain, or an
> outside
>> location?  I'm thinking there should be a way to do it, but it
might
> be
>> tricky.
>> 
>> Mary
>> 
>>>>> "Lilith Calbridge" <lilith@dcccd.edu> 4/26/2007 4:50 PM >>>
>> That's not the crux of the need.  She wants to reply to messages
only
> if
>> they come from anyone in a particular post office.  Although the
> post
>> office is part of the "real" address, it apparently isn't exposed
in
> any
>> of the fields on which a rule can apply.
>> 
>> Lil
>> 
>>>>> On 4/26/2007 at 9:17 AM, Gert <gwcheck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you allow wildcard addressing it works for the PO with sending
>> mail to *
>>> 
>>> Gert
>>> 
>>> GWCheck.com - GWCheck.Info
>>> GroupWise Info for the Open Community
>>> 
>>> http://blog.gwcheck.com 
>>> http://search.gwcheck.com 
>>> http://tools.gwcheck.com 
>>> 
>>> On 4/25/07, Lilith Calbridge <lilith@dcccd.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just had a user ask if it's possible to set up a rule that
>> replies
>>>> only to messages from a specific post office.  Does anyone know
if
>> this
>>>> is possible?  I don't see anything from which that information
can
>> be
>>>> extracted.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Lil
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Visit http://www.ngwlist.com for help unsubscribing
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>> 
>> --
>> Visit http://www.ngwlist.com for help unsubscribing
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Visit http://www.ngwlist.com for help unsubscribing
> 
> --
> Visit http://www.ngwlist.com for help unsubscribing
> 
> 
> --
> Visit http://www.ngwlist.com for help unsubscribing

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]