[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ngw
Subject:    RE: New User
From:       "Doug Miller" <domiller () ma ! ultranet ! com>
Date:       1999-11-29 17:20:29
Message-ID: 002501bf3a8e$089f2e00$d30fa8c0 () apple ! veryfine ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Create the new user with, and send a new message at the same time, by writing an
application that interfaces using the API Gateway??

- Doug Miller


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ngw@lists.dotone.com On Behalf Of Theresa Hoelscher
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 11:52 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list NGW
> Subject: Re: New User
>
>
> We use a saved view with attachments of e-mail policy, new user
> network info and a GW55 cheatsheet.  We haven't found a way to
> automatically send to new users upon creation either.  This works
> great if you remember to send the user the Welcome message! Does
> anyone else have a better idea?
>
> Theresa Hoelscher
> Computer Information Technologist III
> MO Dept of Health
> hoelst@mail.health.state.mo.us
>
> >>> "Michael Herzlich" <Mherzli@nabi.com> 11/29/99 10:41AM >>>
> I created a view and then fill in the blanks.  To setup a view, first
> configure where you save views (tools-options-environment-file
> locations).  Then send yourself an email setup the way you want it
> saved.  Next open the email from your sent items and then file-save
> view and give it a name.  Now when you want to use the template do
> file-open view from the main groupwise screen.
>
> Mike
>
> >>> "Tom Lippe" <lippetd@jacksoncounty.org> 11/24/99 05:33PM >>>
> Is there a way to send a standard message to all new GroupWise
> accounts?  We would like to give instructions and intranet sites to
> new employees to help automate their orientation.
>
> Tom Lippe
> Applications Administrator
> Jackson County, Oregon
>
> *The foregoing  message does not necessarily express the opinion of
> Jackson County or its position on any issue of fact or law.  Nothing
> in the message is intended to waive any appropriate privilege nor any
> applicable exemption from Oregon's Public Records Laws.
>
>
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]