[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nettle-bugs
Subject:    Re: SHA2 renaming
From:       nisse () lysator ! liu ! se (Niels =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date:       2012-12-03 22:57:46
Message-ID: nnd2yqspzp.fsf () stalhein ! lysator ! liu ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:

> fre 2012-11-30 klockan 12:38 +0100 skrev Niels Möller:

>> I think I'd still like to do the header split, sha.h -> sha1.h and
>> sha2.h, for better consistency within Nettle, but that's less intrusive,
>> and backwards compatibility is trivial, with a sha.h including both.
>
> Yes, doing that split makes sense to me.  SHA256 etc doesn't have much
> in common with SHA1, so they belong in separate header files.

I did that split the other day.

And while updating hash documentation, I also reorganized that section
of the manual a bit.

Regards,
/Niels

-- 
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]