[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: netfilter-devel
Subject: [PATCH RFC 22/26] s390: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com>
Date: 2017-06-30 0:01:30
Message-ID: 1498780894-8253-22-git-send-email-paulmck () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
index f7838ecd83c6..217ee5210c32 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -98,13 +98,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lp)
: "cc", "memory");
}
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- while (arch_spin_is_locked(lock))
- arch_spin_relax(lock);
- smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
-}
-
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
* but only one writer.
--
2.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic