[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       netfilter
Subject:    Re: EPERM instead of ENETUNREACH for "to unreachable" route
From:       Bourne Without <blackhole () airpost ! net>
Date:       2013-04-15 14:46:51
Message-ID: 516C12DB.1090804 () airpost ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On 15.04.2013 15:28, markus lottmann wrote:
[...]
> In this setup the command: ping -Q 1 8.8.8.8 yields EPERM instead of the expected \
> ENETUNREACH. Does anyone have an explanation for this? The only thing I found in a \
> web search was that EPERM is returned if an OUTPUT rule in the filter table is \
> dropping packets.

http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=136518055130415&w=2

might answer this

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]