[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       netbsd-tech-net
Subject:    Re: [patch] bug fix & TCP networking performance improvements
From:       David Young <dyoung () pobox ! com>
Date:       2011-05-10 18:17:17
Message-ID: 20110510181717.GQ20998 () ojctech ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> dyoung@pobox.com said:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:40:35PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> > > Btw, I think that it would be better to use microuptime(9)
> > > rather than microtime(9) for these interval things, to make
> > > it robust against time changes. Or getmicrouptime(9) to save
> > > some cycles - accuracy shouldn't be an issue.
> > Definitely.
> 
> Here is something which works.
> OK, the use of kvm in netstat sucks. But it sucks already that
> kvm is needed just to see whether a socket is still in TIME_WAIT,
> so it doesn't make it much worse.

Looks fine to me.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 344-0444 x24
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]