[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       netbsd-tech-kern
Subject:    Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/common/bootimage
From:       Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg () britannica ! bec ! de>
Date:       2015-03-17 13:33:37
Message-ID: 20150317133337.GA29464 () britannica ! bec ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:48:51AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:39:44AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > No, you should not randomly add the expensive ptyfs code to INSTALL kernels
> > > you can not test yourself. Everything else above is fine, as long as sysinst
> > > is silent on ptyfs failure when the compat ipty nodes are available.
> > 
> > Huh? I fully agree with Christos that we *should* move to ptyfs. As
> > such, problems mounting it should *not* be silent.
> 
> What is so unclear about "INSTALL kernels you can not test yourself" ?

That's why he said he will keep COMPAT_BSDPTY for now.

> And if for some reason the INSTALL kernel in question did NOT choose to 
> include ptyfs, but the device setup steff properly creates the old style
> pty nodes, complaining about anything would be extremely stupid.

While the installation will still work, it also allows a report of the
problem. So that after some time, the legacy compat *can* be removed.

Joerg
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]