[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       netatalk-devel
Subject:    RE: [Netatalk-devel] Request for Volunteer: Solaris needs help!
From:       Joe Clarke <marcus () marcuscom ! com>
Date:       2001-12-20 2:47:30
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 21:45, CSBURRIS@ci.tacoma.wa.us wrote:
>  I knew something else was wrong with 64-bit Solaris 8 rc 0.8 besides the
> driver.
> While my driver attached at rc.08, nothing could see it and it couldn't see 
> anything else, not even my production server running 32-bit Solaris. Your
> fix 
> must have made the stack "visible" or whatever. It now works on Macs and is
> visible
> in "nbplkup".
> 
> Now if I could only get "cnid" to work...

What's wrong with it?

Joe

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Clarke
> To: CSBURRIS@ci.tacoma.wa.us
> Cc: sflist@ihonk.com; netatalk-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: 12/18/01 5:18 PM
> Subject: RE: [Netatalk-devel] Request for Volunteer: Solaris needs help!
> 
> On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 18:27, CSBURRIS@ci.tacoma.wa.us wrote:
> > I am singing, I am dancing - I got the new release candidate to run
> with gcc
> > on 64-bit Solaris 2.8  with the /dev/ddp actually talking to the rest
> of the
> > world. I never got rc8 to work, but apparently it wasn't the
> ./sys/solaris
> > driver changes I made, and I didn't have the time/expertise to track
> down
> > the problem. The details are complicated - who should I send the code
> to? I
> > can't use CVS due to a firewall/proxy server problem, so I will have
> to send
> > a tarball as an email attachment, so that someone with access to the
> Sun
> > Compiler can see that I didn't break that compile.
> 
> The Solaris functionality might be due to the endian patch I committed
> as well.  Before RC1, Solaris was treated as a littleendian architecture
> by Netatalk.
> 
> Please sned your patches to me as well as Sebastian and Daniel (at
> least).
> 
> Joe
> 
> > 
> > The shortest answer - compile everything with 32 bit gcc 2.95.2
> > Compile /dev/ddp with 64-bit gcc 3.0.2 with some code changes.
> > 
> > Celeste Suliin Burris
> > Systems Administrator
> > Tacoma Economic Development Dept.
> > csburris@ci.tacoma.wa.us
> > 
> > 
> > > ----------
> > > From: 	Steve Freitas
> > > Sent: 	Monday, December 10, 2001 8:03 PM
> > > To: 	Joe Clarke; pkrohn@daemonize.com
> > > Cc: 	Netatalk-devel; netatalk-admins
> > > Subject: 	Re: [Netatalk-devel] Request for Volunteer: Solaris
> needs
> > > help!
> > > 
> > > > Steve, I know this problem was brought up at the first IRC
> meeting, but
> > > > could you describe it again, citing exactly where the errors
> occur, how
> > > > big your filesystem actually is, and how big afpd is reporting it
> is?  I
> > > > think I've found a problem, but I want to be sure.  Also, I assume
> > > > you're using Solaris 64-bit, correct?  I'm testing with a 64-bit
> Solaris
> > > > 8 machine which I do not have root on.
> > > 
> > > Hi Joe,
> > > 
> > > I don't actually have the problem, I'm just prodding about it. Paul
> Krohn
> > > is
> > > the bug reporter of record, although a couple of others reported it
> as
> > > well.
> > > I'd have to check the compile party log to see.
> > > 
> > > Paul, can you help Joe out?
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netatalk-devel mailing list
> > Netatalk-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
> > 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Netatalk-devel mailing list
Netatalk-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]