[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: net-snmp-support
Subject: [ net-snmp-Support Requests-456646 ] need clarification on snmptrapd -F param
From: noreply () sourceforge ! net
Date: 2001-08-29 21:35:30
[Download RAW message or body]
Support Requests item #456646, was opened at 2001-08-29 13:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=212694&aid=456646&group_id=12694
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: need clarification on snmptrapd -F param
Initial Comment:
To start, here's my environment:
net-snmp version: UCD-snmp version: 4.2.1
OS: SunOS 5.7
command: snmptrapd
I'm trying to run the snmptrapd with the -F parameter
to format the output of my traps. I'm trying out the
examples included in the snmptrapd man page (such as
snmptrapd -F "%02.2h:%02.2j TRAP%w.%q from %A\n")
The traps I'm generating with snmptrap appear to not
come out formated.
Looking into snmptrapd.c, I noted 2 char *'s:
char *trap1_fmt_str = NULL,
*trap2_fmt_str = NULL; /* how to format
logging to stdout */
I noted, that with the -F param it seems to only set
trap1_fmt_str to the param argument, and I haven't
seen it doing anything with trap2_fmt_str. When I
changed my copy of it to change both strings, it was
able to format my traps.
I was wondering what the difference in the 2 strings
are. I noted that there are also 2 default format
strings as well. Are these for different types of
traps? I'm sure if I spent enough time digging, I
might come close to (or even find) the answer but I
thought it would be better to consult those who
already know the code well.
Let me know if you need me to supply any more
information on this matter. Thanks for you time on
this.
Please Cc: G.Principato@motorola.com with any
followups.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-08-29 14:35
Message:
Logged In: NO
I've been able to look further into this and find some of
the answers (but not all).
It looks like the trap2_fmt_str is to hold the format
string when dealing with a v2 trap (whereas the first
fmt_str is for v1 traps).
However, it still looks like the snmptrapd.c code doesn't
do anything with trap2_fmt_str so using -F for v2 traps
won't have any effect. Please correct me if I missed
something.
Below is the modification to the snmptrapd.c code to get
around this issue. If you note any problems with doing
this, please let me know. I'm hoping this issue can be
fixed for the next point release if it's a bug.
starting at line 845, snmptrapd.c:
/* Initialize the world. Create initial user */
init_snmp("snmptrapd");
if (trap1_fmt_str_remember) {
free_trap1_fmt();
free_trap2_fmt(); // Added this line
trap1_fmt_str = strdup(trap1_fmt_str_remember);
trap2_fmt_str = strdup(trap1_fmt_str_remember); //
Added this line
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-08-29 14:32
Message:
Logged In: NO
I've been able to look further into this and find some of
the answers (but not all).
It looks like the trap2_fmt_str is to hold the format
string when dealing with a v2 trap (whereas the first
fmt_str is for v1 traps).
However, it still looks like the snmptrapd.c code doesn't
do anything with trap2_fmt_str so using -F for v2 traps
won't have any effect. Please correct me if I missed
something.
Below is the modification to the snmptrapd.c code to get
around this issue. If you note any problems with doing
this, please let me know. I'm hoping this issue can be
fixed for the next point release if it's a bug.
starting at line 845, snmptrapd.c:
/* Initialize the world. Create initial user */
init_snmp("snmptrapd");
if (trap1_fmt_str_remember) {
free_trap1_fmt();
free_trap2_fmt(); // Added this line
trap1_fmt_str = strdup(trap1_fmt_str_remember);
trap2_fmt_str = strdup(trap1_fmt_str_remember); //
Added this line
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=212694&aid=456646&group_id=12694
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-support mailing list
Net-snmp-support@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-support
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic