[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: net-snmp-patches
Subject: [Net-snmp-patches] [ net-snmp-Patches-1102156 ] 5.1.2 jumbo patch
From: "SourceForge.net" <noreply () sourceforge ! net>
Date: 2006-07-28 9:47:13
Message-ID: E1G6Ow5-0007fH-S8 () sc8-sf-web2 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Patches item #1102156, was opened at 2005-01-14 08:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dts12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=1102156&group_id=12694
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: 5.1.2 jumbo patch for improved AIX 5.2 support
Initial Comment:
The attached patch enables a lot of functionality for
AIX in net-snmp 5.1.2:
in mibgroup host, hrStorage is complete for all AIX
versions now. hrSWRun is also useable, but information
about path and parameters of processes don't come
out, as i found no way to gather them.
MAC address in interfaces list blanked out, as i currently
found no way to get the correct one. Counters are filled
with the correct values now.
ip/icmp/tcp/udp statistics work on AIX 5.2 for the most
common values, but still lots of values are missing.
Especially the number of current established connection
is missing, as libperfstat only provides the number of
established connections since boot. On AIX 4.3.3 and
AIX 5.1 all values are still missing, as libperfstat API
changed to 5.2 and perfstat_protocol is not present in
the previous versions. tcpstats and so are present in
running kernel, but all values are zeroed.
The attached patch is currently not verified for
influence with other platforms, this should be done.
Thanks go to Thomas Stark for defining the need and
DaimlerChrysler for letting me work out those patches
and allowing the contribution of the results to the
community.
Results are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Dave Shield (dts12)
Date: 2006-07-28 10:47
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=88893
I've just applied Oliver's patch #1486307 to the main CVS
development code. I'm assuming that this effectively
replaces the patches listed here?
Feel free to re-open this tracker entry if my assumptions
are wrong!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2006-05-11 09:57
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
Thanks for the work, Oliver. Good to see that my work is
kept alive in net-snmp, as i don't have the official
chance to maintain it like it should be...
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Oliver Lehmann (olivleh1)
Date: 2006-05-11 09:39
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=344876
Find a patch for 5.3.1.pre1 (context diff) at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=1486307&group_id=12694&atid=312694
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders)
Date: 2006-03-11 14:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=848638
while a plain diff may be useful for your AIX users, it's
not helpful to net-snmp developers in order to review your
patch. Please attach a unified/context diff also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2005-12-02 13:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
After having a quick look at the bug database, i decided
to attach out current patch for net-snmp 5.1.2, which
provides a quite robust AIX support.
This again is plain diff format usable with AIX patch
command, as this shall mainly help the users to get some
working net-snmp on AIX. The difference to the last diff
are just some 64bit issues, which i already saw in newer
versions (5.2.1 or so) done for amd64 port. There might
always be several endianess problems, which don't appear
on amd64, i will dive into this next year with a more
current version.
In short: If you want net-snmp on AIX, use 5.1.2 with
these patches, if you encounter any problems with other
versions.
And due to libperfstat, net-snmp must be compiled in 64bit
on 64bit machines, otherwise the agent will hang or crash
on get/walk on some performance related OIDs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2005-12-02 12:49
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
Took a while for me to have the time to look into this
again. I'm still the maintainer of our project around net-
snmp, where AIX is still an important platform. We dropped
AIX 4.3.3 from out internally supported platforms, 5.1
also is currently not maintained, but the rest is. There
were some other minor issues for 64bit i found, but as the
base 5.1.2 we use is not really current, i would re-check
everything with a more current version next year, when a
package upgrade is scheduled (where i also want to upgrade
net-snmp).
I think this would also be a good point to have a look at
the current AIX bugs, as i start with the base net-snmp
package than, without patching it first. This is more
useful to check the bugs, as i can then insert my comments
reflecting some unpatches sf.net version of the source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders)
Date: 2005-08-19 09:35
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=848638
The most effective way to help would be:
- use a fresh CVS checkout (MAIN or V5_2_patches)
- (re)submit your patch against this version
Also, it'd be extremely helpful to get your opinion on the
open AIX bugs in our bug DB. We don't have access to AIX, so
it's hard for us to deal with them. Search for Status==Open
and Group==aix and add your comments to those bugs,
especially the nlist problem (that I think is already
fixed). Thanks in advance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2005-08-19 05:29
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
Besides the machines at work (running 5.2 and 5.3 today,
mixed 32 and 64 bit), i have enough machines at home to test
4.3.3 and 5.1, usually also 5.2 is not a problem, as soon as
i get my 7043-150 back from a friend.
BTW, i recently found a 64bit issue. The AMD64 patches in
newer versions also have to be used for AIX (otherwise
strange Counter32 values :), and 32bit builds can't be run
on 64bit machines (libperfstat issue, can't be fixed, one
needs to build 2 versions if he needs 32 and 64 bit support).
Want to check all this in a newer version, so i'll send a
patch for some 5.2.x if necessary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders)
Date: 2005-08-19 00:29
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=848638
Do you still have access to AIX just in case we'll ask for a
test?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2005-05-13 10:23
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
Here comes a unified diff. This is not applicable on default
AIX installations, as patch doesn't know the format. GNU diff
required. Hope, this helps the developers here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Wes Hardaker (hardaker)
Date: 2005-05-06 06:38
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=76242
Can you resubit your patch using diff -u instead of a straight diff?
It's very hard to apply a diff created the way you submitted it to a
moving target (ie, CVS trees). diff -u gives a diff output that is
easier to both read and apply.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Kukat (vaxpower)
Date: 2005-02-04 11:51
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=794829
Replaced the patch due to a memory leak in hrStorage. This
version is intensively tested, no further leaks detected on
lots of repeated walks oder .1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=1102156&group_id=12694
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-patches mailing list
Net-snmp-patches@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-patches
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic