[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       net-snmp-bugs
Subject:    [ net-snmp-Bugs-782744 ] snmpwalk times out, system load increases
From:       "SourceForge.net" <noreply () sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2006-12-23 3:20:04
Message-ID: 200612230320.kBN3K4gN017821 () sc8-sf-db2-new-b ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Bugs item #782744, was opened at 2003-08-04 03:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=782744&group_id=12694

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: agent
Group: solaris
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: snmpwalk times out, system load increases

Initial Comment:
I am using the pre-compiled binaries for Solaris 8 on 
sun4u hardware (actual kit is Blade 1000).

snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost starts to work but 
then fails.  The last few lines of output are:

HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.4 = INTEGER: 4
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.5 = INTEGER: 5
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.6 = INTEGER: 6
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.7 = INTEGER: 7
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.8 = INTEGER: 8
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.9 = INTEGER: 9
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.10 = INTEGER: 
10
Timeout: No Response from localhost

The system load then increases.  uptime showed it was 
at about 24 a minute after snmpwalk failed.  Rerunning 
snmpwalk fails and snmpd needs to be restarted to both 
decrease the system load and make snmpwalk work 
again.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2006-12-22 19:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1312539
Originator: NO

This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 180 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders)
Date: 2006-06-25 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=848638

Can you please retry with 5.3.1.rc1 or later?

As for the "no storage for OID" issue: what net-snmp version
do you get this with? The message itself comes from a failed
malloc() call -- has this box perhaps been short on memory?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2006-06-25 03:24

Message:
Logged In: NO 

I'm also having this on a sparc64 (enterprise 250) with
freebsd 6.X.

For me this is combined with an "no storage for OID" message
in the snmpd.log 

Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
  GETNEXT message
    -- IF-MIB::ifSpeed.2

Sending 57 bytes to UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
0000: 30 37 02 01  00 04 11 68  61 63 6B 77  65 72 6B 63   
07.....hackwerkc
0016: 6F 6D 6D 75  6E 69 74 79  A2 1F 02 04  4B 5C CF 08   
ommunity....K\..
0032: 02 01 00 02  01 00 30 11  30 0F 06 0A  2B 06 01 02   
......0.0...+...
0048: 01 02 02 01  05 03 42 01  00                         
......B..


Received 56 bytes from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
0000: 30 36 02 01  00 04 11 68  61 63 6B 77  65 72 6B 63   
06.....hackwerkc
0016: 6F 6D 6D 75  6E 69 74 79  A1 1E 02 04  4B 5C CF 09   
ommunity....K\..
0032: 02 01 00 02  01 00 30 10  30 0E 06 0A  2B 06 01 02   
......0.0...+...
0048: 01 02 02 01  05 03 05 00                             
........

Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:61365
  GETNEXT message
    -- IF-MIB::ifSpeed.3
no storage for OID

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2003-08-22 08:23

Message:
Logged In: NO 

I am also getting this on a Solaris 2.6 x86 box using
net-snmp 5.0.8.
Is there a work-around for this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=782744&group_id=12694

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-bugs mailing list
Net-snmp-bugs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-bugs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]