[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       net-snmp-bugs
Subject:    [ net-snmp-Bugs-1043197 ] need os version and release test
From:       "SourceForge.net" <noreply () sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2004-10-21 0:02:18
Message-ID: E1CKQPK-0007yi-QS () sc8-sf-web4 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Bugs item #1043197, was opened at 2004-10-08 13:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slif
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=1043197&group_id=12694

Category: library
Group: linux
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael J. Slifcak (slif)
Assigned to: Michael J. Slifcak (slif)
Summary: need os version and release test

Initial Comment:
The Fedora team has been applying patches to
support quieter operation when run under a Linux 2.6
kernel.
These patches provide the same functionality, providing
the appropriate response to "which os /release is running?"



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michael J. Slifcak (slif)
Date: 2004-10-20 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=88697

netsnmp_os_prematch() now supports any platform that has
sys/utsname.h (effectively, any platform that has uname()).

patchrev51 and patchrevmain were applied to the V5-1-patches
and main branches, respectively, and will be available in
upcoming
releases.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael J. Slifcak (slif)
Date: 2004-10-09 08:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=88697

The patch was reversed from 5-1-patches and from main branch

It does not belong in a feature frozen 5-1-patches branch.

It did not have appropriate discussion before it was applied.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael J. Slifcak (slif)
Date: 2004-10-08 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=88697

Thanks for the bug report!  We've fixed the problem in the
5.1.x code branch and the main development tree,
so it should be fixed in future releases of the net-snmp package.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Story (rstory)
Date: 2004-10-08 13:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=76148

Not sure about this. Why do do a compile time determination,
instead of runtime?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112694&aid=1043197&group_id=12694


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-bugs mailing list
Net-snmp-bugs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-bugs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]