[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nepomuk
Subject:    Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk Service2
From:       Sebastian_Trüg <sebastian () trueg ! de>
Date:       2013-03-25 12:19:13
Message-ID: 515040C1.2030704 () trueg ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Check if anyone stars the server manually like I think Akonadi did or 
maybe they still do...

On 03/21/2013 04:33 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Bird <bladud@gmail.com
> <mailto:bladud@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function
>     just returns the wrong thing?
>
>
> well, the service won't start then. I can probably add a proper debug
> message.
>
> I wonder how the Akonadi people deal with this.
>
>
>      >> > Any comments on renaming nepomukserver?
>      >>
>      >> How about "nepomukmanager"?
>      >
>      >
>      > I meant, should we rename it at all? Or let it be called
>     nepomukserver.
>
>     I would say yes: the cost seems essentially zero, and as you say, it
>     isn't a server, so the name is misleading.
>     But it's your call
>
>
> Lets see if anyone else has an opinion. I'm worried that everyone might
> already be used to calling the nepomuksever and I'll be breaking some
> stuff. Though people should be using nepomukctl now.
>
>
>     Simeon
>
>
>
>
> --
> Vishesh Handa
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]