Very good. :) Sorry for not being active anymore. These past 2 weeks I have been = "working" on my new-born son. Apart from that I am pretty busy with = OpenLink work. I will try to at least look at the review requests more = frequently. On 12/10/2012 02:18 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Quick update - > > Right now the plan is to implement this for 4.11. > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Sebastian Tr=FCg > wrote: > > On 11/23/2012 11:17 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:30 PM, J=F6rg Ehrichs > > >> wrot= e: > > 2012/11/23 Marco Martin >>: > > > On Friday 23 November 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > >> > >> rdf:type > >> nmm:MusicPiece > >> rdf:type > >> nfo:FileDataObject > >> rdf:type > >> nfo:Audio > >> rdf:type > >> nie:InformationElement > >> nie:url > >> file:///home/vishesh/Music/__where_does_the_good_go.mp3 > >> > >> Storing this URL makes accessing file resources quite > convenient. But I > >> fear it has been a terrible design decision. By storing > the url > we face the > >> following problems - > > > > uhm, probably is right, keeping the full file url > consistent is a > mess, > > however... > > > > a very common use case is in the c++ code, doing > Nepomuk2::Resource(file path) > > > > needing a fast way to obtain the resource associated to a > particular file > > (like in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.__cgi?id=3D310525 > ) > > > > otherwise how could be done quickly to have the metadata > of a > file given we > > have the file, and the other way around? > > > It would be slightly more expensive, but not too hard. One would > have to > retrieve the resource for each file resource till the root > element. So > if you give me something like this > Resource("/home/vishesh/kde/__src/file.cpp") > > I'll have to do either multiple queries - > > select ?r where { ?r nfo:filename "home" ; nie:isPartOf > . > } -> homeRes > select ?r where { ?r nfo:filename "vishesh" ; nie:isPartOf > . } > -> visheshRes > .. > .. > or maybe it can be done in one query? > > > I think so: > > select ?r where { ?r nfo:filename "file.cpp" ; nie:isPartOf [ > nfo:filename "src" ; nie:isPartOf [ nfo:filename "kde" ... ] ] } > > I am, however, not sure which is faster. > > In general I like the idea to get rid of file URL, a lot actually. > This could even mean that you get rid of nie:url alltogether. In the > end there is really no need to use nie:url for http or any other > remote resource... > > As for your (3): that should actually be fairly simple. I wrote the > code, which feels very hacky (not the code itself, but the need for > its existance) and it could easily be adapted to only update > nfo:filename and nie:isPartOf. Much simpler in the end. > > All in all: +10 from me if you can get the direct file resource > access fast. > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > > You get the gist. These all could be cached in memory so it > shouldn't be > a big problem. This is actually quite analogous to what the > kernel does > in the file system later, except that it matches inodes to their > filename. We will be matching resource uris. > > I'd say retrieving metadata from a file is a "one-time" job > of the > file-indexer. > Afterwards, we should rely on the data inside Nepomuk and > only get > more once this fails. > > In addition, the nepomuk-core part could offer a convenient > method to > create the file url for the end-user and also cache this > information > for a while to speed up the query. I assume its faster to ch= eck > QFile::exists() than creating the url with every query again. > > > Of course. This all should be transparently handled in the > resource class. > > Other than that, I like the idea. It seems there are > several problems > with remove able media, which doesn't seem to get solved > with the > current way. > > > Yeah. I think so as well. > > But it's a BIG change. All the previous data will first need to > be ported. > > _________________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > Nepomuk@kde.org > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > > > > _________________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > Nepomuk@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/nepomuk > > > _________________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > Nepomuk@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list Nepomuk@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk