[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nepomuk
Subject:    Re: [Nepomuk] On-battery indexing
From:       Martin Steigerwald <Martin () lichtvoll ! de>
Date:       2012-05-12 10:35:53
Message-ID: 201205121235.53900.Martin () lichtvoll ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2012 schrieb Vishesh Handa:
> > Could we do a limited indexing (a few files here and there, not
> > entire filesystems) when the user is on battery without much impact
> > on battery?
> 
> Yup. It is possible.
> 
> And in fact it wouldn't be too hard to implement.
> 
> Right now we have a kind of priority queue where files and folders and
> queued. Routine scanning and indexing of files are given a lower
> priority than files that are added by inotify. So, we just need to
> make sure that only files with this higher priority are indexed when
> the indexer is suspended.

Would be good for newly added files. And probably should be slower, lighter 
on resources than usual indexing.

Not for the initial scan of everything.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]