[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nepomuk
Subject:    [Nepomuk] Re: nepomuk init notification
From:       Chani <chanika () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-01-05 14:35:52
Message-ID: 201101051535.53162.chanika () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


whoops, we wandered offlist. :)
I'm bringing this back here just for history's sake (unarchived discussions 
are doomed to be repeated ;)
oh, but if anyone can answer the BC question that'd be nice too :)

On January 5, 2011 15:20:01 you wrote:
> On January 5, 2011 14:51:34 you wrote:
> > > so... are you ok with that patch (just the dbus call) for 4.6?
> > 
> > yes, ofc
> 
> k, will commit to the branch then :)
> 
> > > mrr. I'm still torn, for 4.7... would a signal in kactivitymanagerd be
> > > a useful abstraction, or just inefficiency?
> > 
> > I'm not sure - kamd will have multiple backends - for different stuff
> > (nepomuk and zeitgeist at least) so I'd rather have an API which
> > allows the user not to know anything about N and Z.

note: either way KActivityInfo is that api, but with a signal in kamd, anyone 
who needed to use it directly would also not need to know it uses nepomuk for 
icons.

> > 
> > Is removing a library link a BC change? (if we decide at some point
> > that storing the icon in Nepomuk is too much)
> 
> I don't know, but I expect it's safe?

-- 
Chani
http://chani.ca

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]