[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ncurses-bug
Subject:    Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?
From:       "Stephan Beal" <sgbeal () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2008-02-12 17:42:05
Message-ID: 6ac046010802120942q2cf8d272s72568cf78c1c54c () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Feb 12, 2008 6:30 PM, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right... and --disable-leaks makes this cleanup happen.  What's the
> rationale for not doing the cleanup process?  Apparently SuSE prefers
> to include it, so it can't be anything fatal.


And of course don't forget to add the configure option --enable-leaks to
turn it back on ;).

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

On Feb 12, 2008 6:30 PM, Avery Pennarun &lt;<a \
href="mailto:apenwarr@gmail.com">apenwarr@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid \
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Right... and \
--disable-leaks makes this cleanup happen. &nbsp;What&#39;s the<br>rationale for not \
doing the cleanup process? &nbsp;Apparently SuSE prefers<br>to include it, so it \
can&#39;t be anything fatal.</blockquote><div><br>And of course don&#39;t forget to \
add the configure option --enable-leaks to turn it back on ;).<br> </div></div><br>-- \
<br>----- stephan beal<br><a \
href="http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/">http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/</a>




_______________________________________________
Bug-ncurses mailing list
Bug-ncurses@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ncurses


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]