[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: nanog
Subject: Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn ! thpl ! lib ! fl ! us>
Date: 1997-07-24 0:59:29
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, Jul 23, 1997 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Mark Bixby wrote:
> netops writes:
> > Does anyone know of any non-ISP companies that have decided to
> > multi-home? Is this a major trend for non-ISP companies running
> > mission-critical applications on the Internet?
>
> We will be going multi-homed in about 2 weeks because the state of California
> has mandated that all community colleges sign up with 4C.net, but we don't
> want to give up our existing CERF.net connection.
Here's an interesting question: is it considered multi-homing to have
connections between an internal backbone and a commercial provider's
backbone in more than one location -- if it's the same commercial
provider?
I have in mind, particularly, people like HP.
My instincts tell me that it probably is, but I wonder what the routing
management differences might be.
Cheers,
-- jr 'if this is off-topic, reply off-list' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology
Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic