[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nanog
Subject:    Re: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack
From:       George Herbert <gherbert () crl ! com>
Date:       1997-07-22 22:03:32
[Download RAW message or body]


>Can we please dispense with the discussion of domain name
>services on the NANOG list? I would personally prefer that
>this discussion be taken elsewhere.

More appropriate lists (as it is no longer appropriate to network operator
discussions) might include com-priv, domain-policy or newdom lists.

It might return to appropriateness if further denial-of-service
attacks take place and network operations are affected again,
but at this time it appears drifting into familiar, often argued,
and inappropriate-to-nanog territory.  The policy discussions
are not operational.

-george william herbert
gherbert@crl.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic