[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: nanog
Subject: Re: Quote from Kashpureff / Re: question about per. hack
From: George Herbert <gherbert () crl ! com>
Date: 1997-07-22 22:03:32
[Download RAW message or body]
>Can we please dispense with the discussion of domain name
>services on the NANOG list? I would personally prefer that
>this discussion be taken elsewhere.
More appropriate lists (as it is no longer appropriate to network operator
discussions) might include com-priv, domain-policy or newdom lists.
It might return to appropriateness if further denial-of-service
attacks take place and network operations are affected again,
but at this time it appears drifting into familiar, often argued,
and inappropriate-to-nanog territory. The policy discussions
are not operational.
-george william herbert
gherbert@crl.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic