[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nanog
Subject:    Re: Savvis quality?
From:       Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet ! us>
Date:       2009-05-27 19:55:06
Message-ID: 4A1D9A9A.4090704 () rollernet ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Paul Wall wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David Hubbard
> <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
>> Just wondering if anyone can tell me their
>> opinion on Savvis bandwidth/company preferably
>> from a web host perspective.  Considering a
>> connection.
> 
> They might be a good provider for reaching Comcast (when they're not
> advertising inconsistently), but so are Level3 and Global Crossing.
> 
> I hear they've got some pretty serious peering problems in the US.
> 

I got an offlist to my response asking about their peering issues. I
said I couldn't comment because I haven't personally experienced any
problems. If anything, I rerouted traffic through SAVVIS heavily during
the Sprint/Cogent peering thing since one of my upstreams is Sprint.

~Seth

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]