[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nanog
Subject:    Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet
From:       Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa ! net>
Date:       2008-07-31 14:31:03
Message-ID: 4891CCA7.6050700 () nic-naa ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

oddly enough, i was chatting with a friend from the w3c while walking 
off-site to lunch from the dublin ietf about the life, and death, of the 
w3c's p3p project (i was a contributor, he works in a different area), 
and its possible re-animation.

without meaning to (i assume) martin's made a landmark post -- one 
mentioning "privacy policy", on nanog.

Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Not so quick.  Privacy policy?
>
> -M<
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although
>>> I
>>> doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
>>>
>>> Note: HD has not been compromised.
>>>       
>> Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's the time to
>> see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]