[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nano-devel
Subject:    Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour
From:       Chris Allegretta <chrisa () asty ! org>
Date:       2014-06-17 18:01:02
Message-ID: CAJqk+=Naso9nOzvGxKy6uWQekyV7BymOqrQ9_94VKG+nz-K50w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 6/17/14, Mark Majeres <mark@engine12.com> wrote:
> On 6/17/14, Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net> wrote:
>
>> Okay.  So when ^K clears the mark, a subsequent ^K should clear
>> the cutbuffer.  Yes?
>>
>> Benno
>>
>
> My vote is yes, and the latest version of the cutbuffer_reset patch
> already reflects this for both cutting and copying.

Agreed

_______________________________________________
Nano-devel mailing list
Nano-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nano-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]