[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       namedroppers
Subject:    Re: unified architecture? probably not.
From:       Masataka Ohta <mohta () NECOM830 ! HPCL ! TITECH ! AC ! JP>
Date:       1996-03-19 21:12:01
[Download RAW message or body]

> >> What I would like to see before anymore changes are made for dynDNS-09
> >> are as follows:
> >>
> >> 1.  Name of Person requesting the change:
> >>
> >> 2.  Reason/Rationale for the change:
> >>
> >> 3.  Existing Wording in the specificiation:
> >>
> >> 4.  Replacement Wording in the specification suggested:
> >
> > Randy, is the above acceptable behaviour of a WG editor in IETF?
>
> If the editor(s) want to ensure wording change requests are unambiguous,
> this seems one way to do it.  Like other formalities, it occasionally
> produces amusing anomalies such as Paul's two screenfulls to delete a word.

The problem is that today is not 4/1, yet.

                                                        Masataka Ohta

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]