[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       namedroppers
Subject:    Re: [dnsext] experimental/testing DNSSEC algorithm identifiers
From:       Samuel Weiler <weiler () tislabs ! com>
Date:       2009-08-18 19:04:55
Message-ID: alpine.BSF.2.00.0908181501470.82556 () fledge ! watson ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Jelte Jansen wrote:

> We have 'private', but that's only one number, and currently there 
> are multiple algorithm proposals. Besides, it might clash with 
> actual privates that are used.

While there are only two private numbers, we did define mechanisms for 
distinguishing between private algorithms (RFC4034, A.1.1).  It may 
well be that such code, if it exists, is buggy, but I think it's worth 
figuring that out.

Given the mechanism in 4034 A.1.1., do you really need more codepoints 
just for testing?

-- Sam

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]