[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       namedroppers
Subject:    RE: 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location  Record
From:       "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake () motorola ! com>
Date:       2007-01-23 17:41:35
Message-ID: 3870C46029D1F945B1472F170D2D979001F750EE () de01exm64 ! ds ! mot ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

I have received no private comments on the current version of the 2929bis draft since \
it was posted. If I do, I'll forward them to this list (or at least the gist of them \
if the commenter has privacy concerns).

While there is no explicit provision for appealing the decision of the Expert, since \
they are appointed by the IESG you could always go to the IESG and try to get the \
Expert replaced. This is the normal thing with the powerful single administrator \
model. 

Donald

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org] On \
                Behalf Of Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:12 AM
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Cc: Otmar Lendl; Edward Lewis
Subject: Re: 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location Record


The public comment period has passed, our AD has appointed a DNS Expert: Edward \
Lewis. Thank you Ed for being willing to take this on.

The working group chairs now pass the token to the expert to review the template \
request and make sure it adheres to the RFC2929bis template, and render his decision \
if this RR type request should be sent to IANA for formal allocation.

In addition the expert is requested to report on the template and rfc2929bis rules \
reporting any issues he detected. In particular the WG is interested in knowing if \
the rules in RFC2929bis are sufficient/overarching/unclear/etc.

This report will be used by our AD to judge if any changes in RFC2929bis RR type \
allocation process are needed before RFC2929bis is published.

Ed, you have 2 weeks to render your decision, which is binding.
Expert review due: January 31'th 23:59 UTC

WG: if you have any issues with this request send it to the mailing list and/or \
expert ASAP, once the expert issues his ruling it is too late.

The notes below are part of the process evaluation and how to reflect what this chair \
has noticed.

Process note #1: WG had no public feedback on the template and its Internet draft, \
editors updated the draft since the original request was sent to namedroppers. \
Editors please send out an message stating if you got any private comments as a \
result of posting the request, no need to say who or what.

Process note #2: Reading RFC2929bis
IANA in the general case only sees approved requests, it is not explicitly stated WHO \
forwards the positive decision by the expert to IANA. In the general case this should \
be the DNS expert. As the expert has not been formally appointed to IANA for this \
experiment the chairs of the working group will communicate with IANA.

Process note #3: As far as I can tell there is no appeal of the DNS Expert decision \
possible, but the requester can resubmit an updated request.

         Olafur

At 03:43 03/01/2007, Otmar Lendl wrote:

> Update:
> 
> On 2006/12/11 13:12, Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at> wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > DNS RRTYPE PARAMETER ALLOCATION TEMPLATE
> > 
> > Date:
> > 
> > 2006/12/11
> > 
> > Originator:
> > 
> > Otmar Lendl <otmar.lendl@enum.at>, +43 1 5056416 33
> > 
> > Specification:
> > 
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-branch-location-record-01
> 
> Based on internal feedback, I've rewritten the explanatory text. It now 
> should be clearer what parts of the DDDS algorithm are amended and thus 
> how the EBL fits into the overall ENUM protocol.
> 
> No changes have been made to the actual specification.
> 
> The current version can be found at:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-branch-location-record-02
> 
> > Any feedback, both regarding the protocol part, as well as the 
> > language of draft-ietf-enum-branch-location-record-01 is very much 
> > welcome. The ENUM WG will put this draft up for last call soon, so 
> > I'd prefer to make any changes as soon as possible.
> 
> The draft is now in WGLC state (till Jan. 15th).
> 
> Once again, any feedback is welcome.
> 
> /ol
> --
> < Otmar Lendl (lendl@nic.at) | nic.at Systems Engineer >
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with 
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word \
                'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]