[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mysql-plusplus
Subject:    Re: Thread-awareness vs thread-safety
From:       Rick Gutleber <rgutleber () above ! net>
Date:       2008-07-09 18:34:55
Message-ID: 487504CF.5060303 () above ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Warren Young wrote:
> Please, keep replies on the list.  I'm allowing this subthread to go 
> off into personal-land, but in general...
Whoops!  That was not intentional.

> Rick Gutleber wrote:
>> I see what I did.  I used "./configure --enable-thread-check" but not 
>> with "--disable-dependency-tracking" like you do in the spec file.
>
> I think you've masked the real fix.  The spec file disables dependency 
> tracking because it slows down the first build in order to make future 
> ones faster and more reliable.  Because an RPM build always starts 
> with a fresh source tree, there is no point to dependency tracking.  
> It just slows things down, with no benefit.
That's what I'd assumed.

>
> Perhaps you forced it to rebuild everything, so that "make clean all" 
> would have given the same result.
OK.  I did the following:

make clean all
./configure --enable-thread-check

and it built successfully.  I guess the difference was that originally I 
did "make clean" before reconfiguring and rebuilding.
> If you're willing to chase this further, I welcome your report. 
> On-list, of course. :)
>
>> I'm building with gcc 3.2.3 on RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.
> I'm curious: why use an old compiler on a new OS?
Oops.  The build machine is still RHEL3, but we're in the process of 
upgrading.  The other development test machines are RHEL 5 now.

Rick


-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=mysql-plusplus@progressive-comp.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]