[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mutt-users
Subject:    Re: Fwd:
From:       "Kevin J. McCarthy" <kevin () 8t8 ! us>
Date:       2020-10-24 21:30:55
Message-ID: X5SdD3zpIFGzu4LI () afu ! lan
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 04:15:24PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:49:12PM -0700, Kevin wrote in 
><X5SFONzhMkALtYAO@afu.lan>:
>>I didn't see any options regarding the wrapper Subject header, so 
>>I've changed the action to munge the From address instead.
>>
>>I originally shied away from this choice because it sets a reply-to 
>>header; however it appears the wrapper option does too.  So I guess 
>>it's the lesser of two evils.
>
>Thanks Kevin! Let's hope this fixes it. Are these default options that
>mailman offers for handling these DMARC policies?

Yes, mailman's dmarc_moderation_action option has either "wrap" or 
"munge_from", (in addition to the standard accept/reject/discard) 
options.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]