[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mutt-users
Subject:    Re: no fcc with command-line sending via '<' body-file
From:       Rado S <regrado () web ! de>
Date:       2007-03-31 12:13:10
Message-ID: 20070331121310.GA11789 () sun36 ! math ! uni-hamburg ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

=- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 16:32:02 -0500 -=

> > > Come to think of it, this has spawned another question. When I
> > > use '<' instead of '-i', I am not even prompted for a password,
> > > which I assume is because mutt doesn't need me to interact with
> > > msmtp. But when I use '-i', Mutt *does* prompt me for my
> > > password (IMAP), even though msmtp doesn't need it, and even
> > > though I am not checking my inbox. What's up with this?
> > 
> > I guess your fcc-folder is on IMAP?!
> > If '<' doesn't do any fcc'ing, then, of course, you won't be asked.
> > If '-i' OTOH does, then it can't save fcc without your IMAP-PW.
> 
> My password is indeed requested for access to my FCC folder when
> using '-i'. Thus ends my secondary question. Thanks, Rado.
> 
> { '<' should act like '-i' just without interactive dialog }
> '-i' makes me do too much to make it worth invoking from the CLI
> rather than just using Mutt normally.

I rarely use CLI mutt, because when I log in I have it open all the
time. Maybe ask mutt-dev or file a wish/ change-request with bts.

-- 
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]