[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mutt-dev
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] mutt vs. courier-imap
From:       Brendan Cully <brendan () kublai ! com>
Date:       2000-04-29 18:52:00
[Download RAW message or body]


On Saturday, 29 April 2000 at 20:21, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-04-29 12:44:48 -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> 
> > Could anyone who has had difficulty using mutt against
> > a Courier-IMAP server please retest with the following
> > patch? It should solve the problem where only half the
> > messages in the index have header information. I'm sure
> > it could be more efficient, but this should be better
> > than nothing.
> 
> The attached patch should have a similar effect, but may
> be easier to understand. Note, however, that it's
> untested.  So your feed-back would be very much appreciated.

Well, I tried it and it seems to work fine. It is certainly simpler to
read. Of course, mine has the dubious advantage that if an IMAP server
provided _no_ blank line after the header set, it would insert the
delimiter instead of allowing two message headers to be gobbled by the
same message... but as I haven't seen that behaviour yet I guess we
don't need to worry about it.

Thanks,
Brendan
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]