[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mutt-dev
Subject:    Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation
From:       Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy () iveqy ! com>
Date:       2013-10-24 8:53:33
Message-ID: 20131024085333.GR13967 () paksenarrion ! iveqy ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:45:05AM +0200, jpacner@redhat.com wrote:
> > And beyond that I think there needs to be a automated C-style checker to
> > enforce consistent C code formatting.  The checker could be run via a
> > gate push hook.
> 
> Why not. Could someone with change repo rights accomplish that?

If you need an automated tool to enforce formatting rules, doesn't that
apply that your code review process is broken and you risc to slip in
serious bugs? Shouldn't formatting rules be part of the ordinary code
review process?

-- 
Med vänliga hälsningar
Fredrik Gustafsson

tel: 0733-608274
e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]