[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mutt-dev
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] attach-sanitize (Was: few questions)
From:       David Champion <dgc () uchicago ! edu>
Date:       2004-07-15 9:01:49
Message-ID: 20040715090149.GC24127 () dust ! uchicago ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

* On 2004.07.13, in <20040714041531.GA6341@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>,
*	"Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
> 
> Whatever we do to attachment file names should probably be
> consistent with what we do to folder names.  Which would probably
> suggest an "attach-hook" that works the same way as "save-hook".
> Whatever tr-like one does would then have to be put into some %
> sequence flag -- maybe combined with a configuration parameter to
> specify the map proper.

This sounds like a good combination of features to me. If nobody objects
or has already started on this, I'll begin drafting something along
these lines to give us something to work with.

-- 
 -D.    dgc@uchicago.edu                                  NSIT::ENSS
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]