[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       musl
Subject:    Re: [musl] Musl-extra: C general-purpose and utility library
From:       Luca Barbato <lu_zero () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-09-19 8:54:34
Message-ID: 5059884A.2080404 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 9/19/12 10:38 AM, Arvid E. Picciani wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:31:47 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>
>> Personally, I think a clean, sane, bloat-free implementation of the
>> C++ standard library would be a lot more valuable for this kind of
>> work than a new non-standardized C library.
>
> for C++? pretty hard to do that, the language is horrible already :/
> I like Qt, since it doesn't even try to follow the C++ spirit,
> but then again its weird on its own.
>
> Indeed, C is not the place to do high level stuff in.
> I'm still waiting for clay [http://claylabs.com/clay/] to become usable,
> before dropping C++ for system services.

Clay uses llvm so till somebody doesn't make a C compiler out of it (or 
make the gcc backend have a decent api like llvm) you will need a C++ 
standard library.

lu

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]