[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mumps-l
Subject:    Re: DSM vs GT.M
From:       Kevin Kirkwood <kevin_kirkwood () SUNSHINE ! NET>
Date:       1996-08-26 17:43:32
[Download RAW message or body]


In article <haysdb-2608960056490001@dfw-tx9-06.ix.netcom.com>,
haysdb@ix.netcom.com (David B. Hays) says:
>
>I've been working in a GT.M (Greystone) shop for the last five years and
>just recently went to work for a company using (formerly Digital) DSM.
>I'm pretty frustrated with DSM.  Now obviously I am intimately familiar
>with GT.M and not so familiar with DSM, so I'm not very objective.
>
>Without getting into what frustrates me about DSM (although I will if you
>ask), are there any of y'all ;) with good experience with both that would
>care to share some of their insight with me?  This is purely of academic
>interest to me, since my shop is not about to change vendors.
>
>By the way, now that DSM is owned by Intersystems (right?), what is the
>future of DSM?


I have about 10 years of experience in DSM and about 4 years in GT.M .
I am curious, what features of DSM do you find a problem ? I actually
find DSM the nore preferable of the two, but it could of course
depend on the application.

Kevin

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]