[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ms-smartcardddk
Subject:    Re: Challenge/Response
From:       Klaus Schutz <kschutz () MICROSOFT ! COM>
Date:       1998-08-18 16:01:24
[Download RAW message or body]


Thomas,

have you tried to use the debug version of the smart card library
and checked if the card sends a WTX request?

Are you sure that the timeout of the driver is not too short?

Klaus U. Schutz
Microsoft

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Bründl [mailto:Thomas.Bruendl@UTIMACO.CO.AT]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 1998 10:02 PM
To: SmartCardDDK@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Challenge/Response


We used a Siemens card (T=1 protocol). The operating system is SAMOS.

Klaus Schutz wrote:

> Thomas,
>
> in order to answer your question, I would like to know, what card you
used,
> and what the card protocol is.
>
> We encountered some cards that are not ISO compliant and do not
> send a restart of work waiting time (T=0) or a WTX request (T=1)
>
> Klaus U. Schutz
> Microsoft
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Bründl [mailto:Thomas.Bruendl@UTIMACO.CO.AT]
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 1998 1:28 AM
> To: SmartCardDDK@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: Challenge/Response
>
> Are there any test for minimum timeouts during Challenge /Response
> operations ? I encountered the situation that a IFD returned  TIMEOUT
> while waiting for the response after a challenge command.
>
> --
> Thomas Bruendl
> Utimaco Safe Concept GmbH
> Europaplatz 6
> A-4020 Linz, Austria
> Tel:    ++43 (0)732 655 755 - 32
> Fax:    ++43 (0)732 655 755 - 5
> E-Mail: Thomas.Bruendl@utimaco.co.at



--
Thomas Bruendl
Utimaco Safe Concept GmbH
Europaplatz 6
A-4020 Linz, Austria
Tel:    ++43 (0)732 655 755 - 32
Fax:    ++43 (0)732 655 755 - 5
E-Mail: Thomas.Bruendl@utimaco.co.at

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]