[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ms-ospf
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call IPR Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and C
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem () gmail ! com>
Date: 2024-04-05 10:42:40
Message-ID: 0FB83CE5-E9B4-4039-A4AD-4E72830CAA9B () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
All IPR responses have now been received.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 12:22 AM, William Britto A J \
> <bwilliam=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
> Thanks,
> William Britto
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, 20 February 2024 at 9:19 PM
> To: William Britto A J <bwilliam@juniper.net>
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org \
> <draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call IPR Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: \
> Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints"
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> All,
>
> Note that the original IPR Poll Email is incorrect. There are no IPR disclosures \
> and the link below points to disclosures for Dynamic Flooding and should have been \
> removed when I pasted it.
> However, I have already received a response from everyone but William Britto.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 2024, at 5:20 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Co-Authors,
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07.txt?
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs \
> > 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> > There are a few IPR statements already - \
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft& \
> > id=draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BAN9wgTUIZM5KPtXuyRASoYLr3LooAg8uK3ScvDK4Nt8SfTtbcrzB17bgQxAE5NDstBdn8as_7z3LgLK3W3E7Q$
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> > to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> > relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
> > list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
> > response has been received from each author and contributor.
> >
> > If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> >
> > Also, we have six authors and four from the same company. Please verify that all \
> > co-authors should be included as such.
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lsr mailing list
> > Lsr@ietf.org
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO \
> > -gk!BAN9wgTUIZM5KPtXuyRASoYLr3LooAg8uK3ScvDK4Nt8SfTtbcrzB17bgQxAE5NDstBdn8as_7z3LgIGbDwR6w$
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic