[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ms-ospf
Subject:    Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
From:       Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com () dmarc ! ietf ! org>
Date:       2021-05-20 23:03:33
Message-ID: AC22219B-1DE4-4D0D-86F4-EC56B9200949 () yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

<I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done>

FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been \
submitted to the RFC Editor.

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" \
<rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi,

    I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so \
modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

    Thanks,
    Yingzhen

    > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman \
<reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>  > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
    > To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
    > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
    > 
    > BFD WG,
    > 
    > Draft minutes have been posted @ \
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/  > 
    > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
    > <tp>
    > 
    > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG \
draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress.  > 
    > Tom Petch
    > 
    > Copying the LSR WG.
    > 
    > 
    > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Reshad.
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]