[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ms-ospf
Subject:    Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF
From:       Acee Lindem <acee () REDBACK ! COM>
Date:       2004-05-25 20:28:21
Message-ID: 035e01c44296$d2d81280$0302a8c0 () aceeinspiron
[Download RAW message or body]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Russ White" <ruwhite@CISCO.COM>
To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF


> >    6. Where both IPR and non-IPR encumbered mechanisms are proposed,
> >       the WG will analyze the technical merits and will try to prefer
> >       unencumbered technology without making technical sacrificies.
>
> I would guess that most of the technical solutions available are going to
> be IPR'd by the parties involved.

There are already a plethora of Manet routing protocols. Perhaps some of
the mechanisms in these can be applied.

> As long as the terms of the IPR's
> involved are "liberal," and acceptable by all the members of the WG, then
> we should consider the best technical solution first.


>
> :-)
>
> Russ
>
> __________________________________
> riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]