[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ms-dcom
Subject:    Re: Disappearing methods on COM+-proxy
From:       Andreas Magnusson <andreas.magnusson () INTENTIA ! SE>
Date:       2001-09-24 9:33:27
[Download RAW message or body]


Nope, we don't use the version numbers in the tlibs. The real problem is
that since its a COM+ proxy, nothing ever seems to be written in the
registry. Everything is in the COM+ catalog, and through the COM+ explorer
everything seems OK. I will continue to investigate the issue.

/Andreas

Andreas Magnusson, R A&T Intentia R&D AB
I speak on my own, and do not need my company's help




Brian Muth <bmuth@SWI.COM>
Sent by: Distributed COM-Based Code <DCOM@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
2001-09-22 17:23
Please respond to Distributed COM-Based Code


        To:     DCOM@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: Disappearing methods on COM+-proxy


At any time did someone create type libraries with different version
numbers?
I'm tempted to unregister and remove everything from the problem machine
again, then scan the registry for all occurrences of the type library
and proxy-stub, and then register from scratch.
It really sounds like an obsolete type library is being referenced.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]