[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: mpls
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky () gmail ! com>
Date: 2020-10-27 0:55:00
Message-ID: CA+RyBmUGMUaW5p86rv6WrwNEjCqcz4G74OOZXaPbeo_Oih20Lw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Dear All,
updates in the new version are to address comments and suggestions from Loa
(many thanks!). Also, we've investigated how the active OAM would work in
SFC-MPLS (SFC with MPLS forwarding plane) and proposed the solution using
G-ACh and GAL,
Much appreciate your comments, questions, and suggestions.
Regards,
Yao and Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Liu Yao <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Revision: 01
Title: MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency
Verification
Document date: 2020-10-25
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 14
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01
Abstract:
This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between
Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the
specified Service Function Path and the state of its data. It works
for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.
This document defines the signaling of the Generic Associated Channel
(G-ACh) over a Service Function Path (SFP) with an MPLS forwarding
plane using the basic unit defined in RFC 8595. The document also
describes the processing of the G-ACh by the elements of the SFP.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr">Dear All,<div>updates in the new version are to address comments and \
suggestions from Loa (many thanks!). Also, we've investigated how the active OAM \
would work in SFC-MPLS (SFC with MPLS forwarding plane) and proposed the solution \
using G-ACh and GAL,</div><div>Much appreciate your comments, questions, and \
suggestions.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Yao and Greg<br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">---------- Forwarded message \
---------<br>From: <span dir="auto"><<a \
href="mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org">internet-drafts@ietf.org</a>></span><br>Date: \
Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM<br>Subject: New Version Notification for \
draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt<br>To: Greg Mirsky <<a \
href="mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com">gregimirsky@gmail.com</a>>, Liu Yao <<a \
href="mailto:liu.yao71@zte.com.cn">liu.yao71@zte.com.cn</a>><br></div><br><br><br> \
A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt<br> has been \
successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the<br> IETF repository.<br>
<br>
Name: draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification<br>
Revision: 01<br>
Title: MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency \
Verification<br> Document date: 2020-10-25<br>
Group: Individual Submission<br>
Pages: 14<br>
URL: <a \
href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt</a><br>
Status: <a \
href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/</a><br>
Htmlized: <a \
href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification</a><br>
Htmlized: <a \
href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01</a><br>
Diff: <a \
href="https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01</a><br>
<br>
Abstract:<br>
This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between<br>
Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the<br>
specified Service Function Path and the state of its data. It works<br>
for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.<br>
<br>
This document defines the signaling of the Generic Associated Channel<br>
(G-ACh) over a Service Function Path (SFP) with an MPLS forwarding<br>
plane using the basic unit defined in RFC 8595. The document also<br>
describes the processing of the G-ACh by the elements of the SFP.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission<br>
until the htmlized version and diff are available at <a href="http://tools.ietf.org" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">tools.ietf.org</a>.<br> <br>
The IETF Secretariat<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic