[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mpls
Subject:    Re: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
From:       Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella () gmail ! com>
Date:       2020-10-21 22:20:38
Message-ID: D6BE2613-9DB8-4A0A-A892-2F198E31EE11 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Loa,

To your questions:
- I think this document is of interest; we have implemented a prototype, and seen \
                interest from SPs, and done some demos.
- there is not much further work needed as all the previous directorate reviews have \
been addressed (of course, a new WGLC/IETF LC may uncover some new nits/comments).

Said as a co-author on the draft.
Kireeti 

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 09:04, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This mail starts a two week poll to establish the interest to continue work on \
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr. 
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were returned to the working to the working group (about 2 \
> weeks ago). 
> Normally a document is returned this late in the process when a necessary change is \
> discovered that requires working group consensus (i.e. a wglc) to implement. This \
> time the document were returned due to lack of (or very slow) response to \
> directorate or the IESG reviews. 
> When a document is returned for a well defined technical change it is fairly easy \
> to handle, we make the change and do a wglc. 
> I have spent time trying to figure out what to do in a case like this. There is \
> very little information in our process document. The wg chairs has converged on the \
> following small process. 
> - establish wg interest for the document, i.e. is this something we want to do and \
>                 do we have interest participating in progressing the document.
> - leave approximately 2 weeks for working group discussion
> - wglc
> - when comments from the wglc is resolved, redo the publication request
> 
> This document start a two week poll to establish the level of interest to continue \
> to work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr. 
> Please answer the following 2 questions:
> 
> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is need and will actually be deployed?
> 
> - do you have the cycles to contribute to progressing the document
> 
> /Loa
> for the working group chairs
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]