[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mpls
Subject:    Re: [mpls] mpls wg review and update of the draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap
From:       Erik Nordmark <nordmark () acm ! org>
Date:       2016-11-18 3:49:44
Message-ID: 57760232-8789-c072-e637-939b54f91fb5 () acm ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/18/16 12:25 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> At the rtgwg meeting in Seoul today, it was reported that 
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap has been stable for some time. However it 
> has been
> pointed out that MPLS is not very well covered.
>
> This is a request that people within need to mpls wg review the document
> and if possible supply text to improve the coverage of mpls. As Erik N
> said at the meeting "please send text".
In addition, it would be fine to add text which says "Encapsulations 
which use MPLS need to also consider issue X; see details in RFCNNNN 
section Y."
Thus we don't need to repeat text for issues that are already explained 
somewhere else.

Thanks,
    Erik

>
> Please send comments to authors, rtgwg and mpls wg mailing lists.
>
> /Loa


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]