[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mplayer-docs
Subject:    Re: [MPlayer-DOCS] Improvement to README for 64 bit essentials
From:       "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <dominik () rangers ! eu ! org>
Date:       2008-10-26 20:35:29
Message-ID: 20081026203528.GA8618 () mokona ! greysector ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday, 26 October 2008 at 21:03, Wolfgang Knauf wrote:
> 
> >> The 32 bit essentials package contains the full set of files (e.g. 
> >> "drvc.so"), while the 64 bit contains only those libraries, which are 
> >> compiled in 64 bit (again "drvc.so" and a few others). So, it seems that 
> >> on a 64 bit machine, you have to first extract the 32 bit binaries, and 
> >> replace SOME files with the 64 bit versions.
> > 
> > No, we made those packages the way they are for a reason.  They contain
> > all the necessary parts, nothing else needed.
> 
> That's strange: the 32 bit package contains 64 files (*.dll, *.ax, 
> *.acm, ...), while the 64 bit package contains only 4 files (*.so). So, 
> 60 codec files are not necessary on 64 bit linux? At least, this should 
> be mentioned in the readme to avoid confusion.

We simply don't have those 60 other codecs in 64bit versions.

> >> PS: Hope I did not top-post again (I just reply in Thunderbird)
> > 
> > You failed.  Next time please read Google's first hit on the
> > subject, then you don't have to make wrong assumptions.
> > 
> 
> That's no top post, I hope ;-)

Yes, that's better.

Regards,
R.

-- 
MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu | Livna http://rpm.livna.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
	-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
MPlayer-DOCS mailing list
MPlayer-DOCS@mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-docs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]