[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mp3encoder
Subject:    [MP3 ENCODER] problems compiling CVS Lame
From:       Hetz Ben Hamo <hetz-home () cobol2java ! com>
Date:       2001-05-25 22:46:30
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

I have browsed the mailing list before I sent this email, and didn't find an 
answer for this:

Machine: Athlon 800 Mhz (not overclocked), Redhat 7.1 (gcc 2.96-81)..

I have replaced the nasm, as I've read here on the mailing list, grabbed lame 
from CVS and tried to compile...

Here is a snip of the error:

util.h:138:17: warning: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C89
util.h:138:17: warning: (this will be reported only once per input file)
util.c:132:15: warning: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C89
util.c:132:15: warning: (this will be reported only once per input file)
util.c: In function `ATHformula_jd':
util.c:257: initializer element is not computable at load time
util.c:257: (near initialization for `ath_table[0]')
util.c:257: initializer element is not computable at load time
util.c:257: (near initialization for `ath_table[1]')
util.c:257: initializer element is not computable at load time
util.c:257: (near initialization for `ath_table[2]')
util.c:257: initializer element is not computable at load time
util.c:257: (near initialization for `ath_table[3]')
make[3]: *** [util.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/kde21/lame/libmp3lame'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/kde21/lame/libmp3lame'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kde21/lame'
make: *** [all-redirect] Error 2

Suggestions?

And regarding the debate here about Redhat's and their GCC move - I'm sorry, 
but I completly agree with Redhat's position. You haven't tried GCC 2.95 with 
machines like Alpha or Sparc to see how pathetic it is, compared to CCC 
(Compaq C compiler) for example. The GCC development speed is twice as slower 
then mozilla's for example.

So yes, they did took a snapshot - but now I see on my X86 at least a 10% 
faster binary then with gcc 2.95. No wonder Mandrake 8 included this gcc 
also..

Of course - this is just my humble opinion. I Really wouldn't like to piss 
anyone here...

Thanks,
Hetz
- --
MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/

------------------------------


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]