[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mono-winforms-list
Subject:    Re: [Mono-winforms-list] fully portable IDE with GTK
From:       Pavel Bansky <levap () bansky ! net>
Date:       2005-11-22 13:57:49
Message-ID: 438323DD.5040306 () bansky ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

I think this is different look on portability. SharpDevelop is really 
cool becasuse bring all power and native look of windows UI, same as 
MonoDevelop brings all power of Gnome UI. This is for me the problem of 
Java IDEs like NetBeans - they stay somewhere in the middle of all 
systems and they are nowhere at home. I want IDE fully integreated with 
the desktop where I code.

For me is necesary that I can write applications binded to the specific 
system but also write applications that is fully portable - with one 
framework. Mono rulez!

Marko Zmak wrote:
> I agree with you Miguel, although the practical portability of any 
> system or language does depend on portability of it's developement 
> tools. For me, portability isn't complete if I have to use one IDE to 
> write a program in Windows, and then use another (and thus adapt some 
> parts of the program) on Linux.
> 
> But, I agree that people should stop confusing M and MD.
> 
> Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> 
>> Mono != MonoDevelop, you should stop confusing those.
>>
>> There are *many* Gnome specific applications for Linux built with Mono,
>> and that has *nothing* to do with Mono's own portability.
>>  
>>
> 

-- 
__________________________________________________________

Pavel Bánský
levap at bansky.net                        I write code...
__________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Mono-winforms-list maillist  -  Mono-winforms-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-winforms-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]