[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mono-vb
Subject:    AW: [mono-vb] Test results
From:       "Jochen Wezel (CompuMaster GmbH)" <jwezel () compumaster ! de>
Date:       2004-11-03 17:09:17
Message-ID: 5A76902A3F45ED4699E4C93DAD0E7869014874 () srv04 ! lan ! compumaster ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Jambu!

Good to know that this is the current class status page, now. I was a little bit \
confused about the many test scenarios and always have looked to the wrong one. And \
http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-HEAD-vs-fx-1-1/class-status-Microsoft.VisualBasic.html \
(what is "HEAD" - know I know it's the main development branch) doesn't shows any \
results.

But okay, now I know it: it's \
http://www.go-mono.com/class-status-Microsoft.VisualBasic.html  Would be great if \
somebody could add this link to http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/ so that nobody \
gets confused any more...

Thanks
Jochen


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jambunathan Jambunathan [mailto:kjambunathan@novell.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 13:08
An: Jochen Wezel (CompuMaster GmbH); mono-vb@lists.ximian.com
Betreff: Re: [mono-vb] Test results

Jochen

> 
http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-1-0-vs-fx-1-1/class-status-Micr

osoft.VisualBasic.html

If you carefully notice, you would realise that it's against the 1.0 tree.  Since the \
VB.NET compiler and the runtime are currently in pre-production state we have decided \
not to back port our fixes to the 1.0 tree.

The link below shows that the ControlChars are just fine in the cvs HEAD branch

http://www.go-mono.com/class-status-Microsoft.VisualBasic.html 


Regards,
Jambunathan K.

> > > "Jochen Wezel (CompuMaster GmbH)" <jwezel@compumaster.de> 10/28/04
12:50 PM >>>
Hi!

Does anybody has an idea why the controlchars have errors?
http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-1-0-vs-fx-1-1/class-status-Micr

osoft.VisualBasic.html

ControlChars: 100%: 4
	! Cr
	! CrLf
	! Lf
	! NewLine

! = Error

They should be correct, I'd say...or is something getting compared which is not the \
current development but an old mirror from several months ago?

Thanks!

Regards
Jochen


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]