[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mono-devel-list
Subject:    Re: [Mono-devel-list] Guidelines: Application Deployment;
From:       Marcus <mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com>
Date:       2005-06-27 0:11:59
Message-ID: 200506261911.59405.mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I remember that MSBuild originally did not use the GAC. Then they changed 
their minds. A brief summary of the situation is given in 
http://channel9.msdn.com/wiki/default.aspx/MSBuild.MsbuildAssembliesInTheGac.
I do wish that they had elaborated on the problems that putting the assemblies 
in the GAC created.


On Sunday 26 June 2005 3:27 pm, Ben Maurer wrote:

> Of course, one other advantage of non-gac'd installs is that they are
> more relocatable. In fact, you could do xcopy deploy that way. It really
> only makes sense to use the GAC if what you are deploying is a shared
> library, right?
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]